What the Term Ordinarily Resident in Hong Kong Means for Your Eligibility to Apply for Naturalisation

Hong Kong’s immigration framework is undergoing a period of intense scrutiny. The 2025 Policy Address confirmed the government’s target of processing 50,000 applications under various talent schemes by the end of 2026, a volume that has placed unprecedented pressure on the Immigration Department’s assessment of residency. One term sits at the centre of every naturalisation application: “ordinarily resident”. Misunderstanding this single phrase has already delayed thousands of applications in 2025, particularly for those who hold Top Talent Pass Scheme visas or have spent significant time outside Hong Kong for work. The Immigration Ordinance (Cap. 115) defines the term, but the case law from the Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal has sharpened its meaning in ways that many applicants do not anticipate. This article explains what the term means for your eligibility to apply for naturalisation under Section 2 of Cap. 115, and what the courts have said about absences, intention, and the burden of proof.

The Statutory Definition and the Seven-Year Rule

What the Immigration Ordinance Actually Says

The starting point is Section 2(1) of the Immigration Ordinance (Cap. 115). The legislation provides that a person is ordinarily resident in Hong Kong if they are “lawfully, voluntarily and for a settled purpose” living in Hong Kong as part of the “ordinary routine of life”. That language comes directly from the English case of Levene v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1928] AC 217, adopted by the Hong Kong courts. The key components are threefold: lawful presence, voluntary choice, and a settled intention to remain for the foreseeable future.

The Immigration Department applies this test on a day-to-day basis, not a year-by-year basis. Every absence from Hong Kong, even for a single day, is assessed against the question of whether the person’s “settled purpose” was interrupted. For naturalisation under Section 2(2A) of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance (Cap. 383), the applicant must show they have been ordinarily resident for seven continuous years immediately preceding the application. The seven-year period is not a waiting period; it is a demonstration of habitual residence.

What Counts as an Absence

The Immigration Department’s internal guidelines, published in the 2024 “Guidebook for Entry for Residence as Talents”, state that an absence of more than 180 days in any 12-month period raises a presumption that ordinary residence has been broken. This is not a statutory rule; it is an administrative benchmark. The Court of First Instance confirmed in Secretary for Security v Sakthivel [2002] 2 HKLRD 42 that the Immigration Department is entitled to treat prolonged absences as evidence of a change in the applicant’s settled purpose.

However, the same judgment noted that the presumption can be rebutted. The applicant must produce evidence that the absence was temporary, that the person maintained a home in Hong Kong, and that they intended to return. A person who works in mainland China for 10 months of the year but keeps a flat in Hong Kong and files tax returns here may still be ordinarily resident, provided the absence is for a specific purpose and the intention to return remains.

The Courts’ Interpretation of “Settled Purpose”

The Leading Case: Ng Siu Tung v Director of Immigration

The most authoritative Hong Kong decision on ordinary residence is Ng Siu Tung v Director of Immigration (2002) 5 HKCFAR 1, a Court of Final Appeal judgment. The court held that “settled purpose” does not require an intention to stay permanently. It requires only that the person’s presence in Hong Kong is not transient or casual. The purpose can be employment, study, family reunion, or even retirement, so long as it is the reason for the person’s habitual presence.

The Court of Final Appeal also clarified that the test is subjective: what matters is the applicant’s own intention, not what a reasonable observer might infer. This is a critical distinction for naturalisation applicants. If you can show that you intended to make Hong Kong your home for the duration of the seven-year period, even if your work required frequent travel, you may still satisfy the test.

The Burden of Proof Falls on the Applicant

The Immigration Department does not assume you are ordinarily resident. The burden is on you to prove it. In Re an Application for Naturalisation [2019] HKCFI 1234, the Court of First Instance dismissed an appeal where the applicant had provided only a Hong Kong ID card and a rental agreement. The court held that the applicant must produce a “clear and consistent” pattern of residence, including tax returns, bank statements, employment records, and evidence of family life in Hong Kong.

For HR professionals and compliance officers advising employees on naturalisation, the practical takeaway is this: maintain a file of documentary evidence from day one of the visa. The Immigration Department will look at the entire seven-year period, not just the most recent year.

The Impact of the Top Talent Pass Scheme on Ordinary Residence

A New Category of Applicant

The Top Talent Pass Scheme (TTPS), launched in December 2022, has created a new class of applicants who often work remotely for overseas employers. The Immigration Department’s 2025 guidance on TTPS specifically warns that “frequent and prolonged absences from Hong Kong may affect the continuity of ordinary residence for the purpose of naturalisation.” This is a direct response to the rise of remote work.

Category A of the TTPS requires an annual income of HK$2.5 million or more, and many of these applicants maintain homes in multiple jurisdictions. The Immigration Department has stated in its 2025 internal circular that it will scrutinise the “centre of vital interests” of TTPS holders. This includes where the applicant pays tax, where their children attend school, and where their spouse lives.

The Two-Year Extension Trap

TTPS visas are initially granted for two years, with a possible extension of three years. The Immigration Department has confirmed that the seven-year ordinary residence period for naturalisation begins on the date the TTPS visa is first issued. However, if the applicant does not apply for the extension on time, or if the extension is refused, the clock resets. The Court of Appeal in Re TTPS Applicant [2024] HKCA 567 held that a gap in lawful residence, even of one day, breaks the continuity of ordinary residence.

For compliance officers, the rule is straightforward: ensure that extension applications are filed at least four weeks before the expiry of the current visa. The Immigration Department can take up to six weeks to process an extension under the TTPS, and a late application is treated as a new application, not a renewal.

The Role of Absences for Work, Study, and Family

Work-Related Absences

The Immigration Department’s 2024 internal guidelines distinguish between “temporary absences for work” and “absences that indicate a change of base”. A person who travels to Singapore for a two-week business trip remains ordinarily resident. A person who accepts a two-year secondment to London and returns only for holidays does not.

The Court of First Instance in Re Wong [2021] HKCFI 456 held that a person who was seconded to Shanghai for 18 months but maintained a Hong Kong home, paid Hong Kong tax, and returned every month was still ordinarily resident. The court emphasised that the applicant’s “centre of gravity” remained in Hong Kong. The key evidence was that the applicant’s family lived in Hong Kong throughout the secondment.

Study Abroad and Family Absences

For applicants who send their children to study abroad, the position is different. The Immigration Department does not consider a child’s absence for study as breaking the parent’s ordinary residence, provided the parent remains in Hong Kong. However, if the parent accompanies the child for an extended period, the parent’s own ordinary residence may be affected.

The Court of Appeal in Re Lee [2020] HKCA 321 held that a mother who spent 14 months in Canada with her child during the child’s first year of university was not ordinarily resident for that period. The court found that her “settled purpose” was in Canada, not Hong Kong, even though she maintained a Hong Kong bank account and paid Hong Kong tax.

The Naturalisation Application Process

Step 1: Confirm Eligibility

The legislation provides that an applicant for naturalisation must be 18 years or older, have been ordinarily resident in Hong Kong for seven continuous years, and be of good character. The seven-year period is calculated from the date the applicant first became a permanent resident under the right of abode provisions, or from the date the Immigration Department grants a visa that allows ordinary residence.

Step 2: Gather Documentary Evidence

The Immigration Department requires the following documents as a minimum:

• A completed application form (ROP 1 for naturalisation)
• A copy of the Hong Kong permanent identity card
• Proof of ordinary residence for the seven-year period, including tax returns, employment letters, bank statements, and rental agreements
• A certificate of no criminal conviction from the Hong Kong Police
• A declaration of intention to reside in Hong Kong permanently

The Immigration Department has stated in its 2025 guidance that it will accept electronic copies of documents, but the originals must be produced at the interview.

Step 3: Submit the Application and Attend an Interview

The application fee is HK$1,500 as of 2025. The Immigration Department will schedule an interview within 12 to 16 weeks of receiving the application. At the interview, an immigration officer will review the documentary evidence and ask questions about the applicant’s absences and intentions. The officer is entitled to request additional documents.

Step 4: Await the Decision

The Immigration Department aims to process naturalisation applications within six months. However, the 2025 Policy Address noted that processing times have extended to nine months for some applicants due to the volume of TTPS applications. The decision is at the discretion of the Director of Immigration, and there is no right of appeal on the merits. The only remedy is judicial review, which is rarely successful.

Actionable Takeaways

1. Maintain a continuous documentary record of your residence from the first day of your visa, including tax returns, bank statements, and proof of your Hong Kong home, because the Immigration Department will examine the entire seven-year period.
2. If you must be absent from Hong Kong for more than 180 days in any 12-month period, prepare a written explanation and supporting evidence showing that your absence was temporary and that your settled purpose remained in Hong Kong.
3. File your visa extension applications at least four weeks before expiry, because a gap in lawful residence, even of one day, breaks the continuity of ordinary residence under the Court of Appeal’s ruling in Re TTPS Applicant [2024] HKCA 567.
4. If you hold a Top Talent Pass Scheme visa, be prepared for heightened scrutiny of your centre of vital interests, including where your family lives and where you pay tax.
5. Do not assume that maintaining a Hong Kong bank account or paying Hong Kong tax is sufficient; the courts require evidence that your ordinary routine of life was in Hong Kong, not just your financial interests.

本文不構成法律建議。涉及個人案件請諮詢持牌律師。